I wanted to share some thoughtful feedback regarding the reusable sticker sheets, as this is truly an incredible system with the potential to benefit almost every household. The concept, quality, and overall purpose of the product are excellent, and it’s clear how valuable the system can be when implemented as a complete solution.
During the purchasing process for my household (two adults and two children), I noticed several opportunities where reformatting the sticker sheets could significantly improve both the customer experience and accessibility of the product line. While I was able to proceed with the purchase, the initial setup cost for a family was quite substantial, and I can see how the current organization of the sticker sheets could be a deterrent for many potential customers—particularly those who need to purchase multiple sheets at once.
Because this system works best when purchased comprehensively rather than in smaller increments, reducing overlap and unnecessary waste would likely lower costs for customers and make the purchasing process feel far less overwhelming. I often found myself moving between sheets trying to determine which offered the most usable stickers, or feeling forced to purchase an entire sheet for a single sticker that wasn’t available elsewhere. At times, this created unnecessary stress when deciding whether to forgo a helpful sticker simply to avoid waste.
Additionally, it was difficult to make confident decisions about which sheets to purchase—and how many—because a single sheet often did not provide enough repeats to support recurring tasks. For example, if a sheet only included one “pay bills” sticker, but the task needed to be completed four times per month, it becomes hard to justify purchasing four identical sheets just to meet that one need. This can make individual stickers feel disproportionately expensive and further complicate the purchasing decision.
The following are a few suggestions that could create meaningful improvements while preserving the integrity of the product:
• Shift from age-based to universal organization
Many stickers are universally applicable and do not need to be divided into “kids” versus “adults.” Removing age-based distinctions could simplify the product line and make the system more flexible for a wider range of households.
• Organize sticker sheets by functional category
Reducing crossover between sheets and instead grouping stickers by categories such as hygiene, self-care, household maintenance, pet care, chores, medical, activities, educational, food/drink, etc. would significantly improve clarity and usability. Grouping similar tasks together would make it easier for customers to find what they need and purchase efficiently.
Introducing subcategories within broader categories could add depth to the product line while maintaining cohesion. For example, pet care could serve as the overarching category, with subcategories for specific pets (dogs, cats, reptiles, etc.), allowing customers to select exactly what applies to their household while keeping everything logically grouped.
• Increase repetition of stickers within each sheet
Including a minimum of four repeats of the same sticker within a category-based sheet would better support families managing recurring tasks across multiple boards or planning intervals (daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, etc.). This would reduce waste, help customers purchase fewer sheets overall, and provide backups in case a sticker is lost or damaged.
Taken together, these adjustments could make the purchasing process less stressful, more cost-effective, and more intuitive—while further strengthening an already outstanding system. The product has tremendous potential, and I hope this feedback is helpful as the company continues to refine and grow the offering.
To leave a comment, please authenticate.
